Written the collision resolution section
This commit is contained in:
parent
a567c6571c
commit
0b1274b92a
Binary file not shown.
@ -5,25 +5,25 @@
|
|||||||
\usepackage[]{subcaption}
|
\usepackage[]{subcaption}
|
||||||
\usepackage[]{float}
|
\usepackage[]{float}
|
||||||
\usepackage[]{multicol}
|
\usepackage[]{multicol}
|
||||||
|
\usepackage{mathtools}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\usepackage{tikz}
|
\usepackage{tikz}
|
||||||
\usepackage{tkz-euclide}
|
\usepackage{tkz-euclide}
|
||||||
\usetikzlibrary{external,shapes,through}
|
\usetikzlibrary{external,shapes,through,arrows}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\tikzexternalize[prefix=figures/]
|
\tikzexternalize[prefix=figures/]
|
||||||
\tikzstyle{none}=[]
|
\tikzstyle{none}=[]
|
||||||
\input{./tikzs/styles.tikzstyles}
|
\input{./tikzs/styles.tikzstyles}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\tikzset{>=stealth}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\pgfdeclarelayer{nodelayer}
|
\pgfdeclarelayer{nodelayer}
|
||||||
\pgfdeclarelayer{edgelayer}
|
\pgfdeclarelayer{edgelayer}
|
||||||
\pgfsetlayers{edgelayer,nodelayer,main}
|
\pgfsetlayers{edgelayer,nodelayer,main}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\graphicspath{{../figures/}{./figures/}}
|
\graphicspath{{../figures/}{./figures/}}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\newcommand*{\vv}[1]{\overrightarrow{#1}}
|
\newcommand*{\vv}[1]{\overrightarrow{#1}}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\newcommand*{\figref}[1]{\figurename~\ref{#1}}
|
\newcommand*{\figref}[1]{\figurename~\ref{#1}}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\captionsetup{labelfont={bf}}
|
\captionsetup{labelfont={bf}}
|
||||||
|
@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
|
|||||||
\section{Calculations}
|
\section{Calculations}
|
||||||
\label{appendix:calculations}
|
\label{appendix:calculations}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\paragraph{Moment of inertia of rectangle}
|
\subsection{Moment of inertia of rectangle}
|
||||||
\begin{equation}
|
\begin{equation}
|
||||||
\label{eq:rect_moment_long}
|
\label{eq:rect_moment_long}
|
||||||
\begin{split}
|
\begin{split}
|
||||||
@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
|
|||||||
\end{equation}
|
\end{equation}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\newpage
|
\newpage
|
||||||
\paragraph{Moment of inertia of sub-triangle of regular polygon}
|
\subsection{Moment of inertia of sub-triangle of regular polygon}
|
||||||
Before starting the calculations, it is to be noted that according to Figure
|
Before starting the calculations, it is to be noted that according to Figure
|
||||||
\ref{fig:subtriangle}, we have that
|
\ref{fig:subtriangle}, we have that
|
||||||
$$ \tan\left(\frac{\theta}{2}\right) = \frac{\frac{l}{2}}{h} = \frac{l}{2h} $$
|
$$ \tan\left(\frac{\theta}{2}\right) = \frac{\frac{l}{2}}{h} = \frac{l}{2h} $$
|
||||||
@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ it will be useful to simplify the result of the integral.
|
|||||||
\end{equation}
|
\end{equation}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\newpage
|
\newpage
|
||||||
\paragraph{Moment of inertia of sub-triangle of arbitrary polygon} Recall
|
\subsection{Moment of inertia of sub-triangle of arbitrary polygon} Recall
|
||||||
equation \ref{eq:r} defines
|
equation \ref{eq:r} defines
|
||||||
$$ \vec r = \alpha \vv{CA} + \beta \alpha \vv{AB} $$
|
$$ \vec r = \alpha \vv{CA} + \beta \alpha \vv{AB} $$
|
||||||
\begin{equation}
|
\begin{equation}
|
||||||
@ -62,3 +62,10 @@ $$ \vec r = \alpha \vv{CA} + \beta \alpha \vv{AB} $$
|
|||||||
&= \frac{\rho hb}{4} \left(\frac{1}{3}\vv{AB}^2 + \vv{AB} \cdot \vv{CA} + \vv{CA}^2\right) \\
|
&= \frac{\rho hb}{4} \left(\frac{1}{3}\vv{AB}^2 + \vv{AB} \cdot \vv{CA} + \vv{CA}^2\right) \\
|
||||||
\end{split}
|
\end{split}
|
||||||
\end{equation}
|
\end{equation}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\newpage
|
||||||
|
\subsection{Solving for impulse parameter}
|
||||||
|
\label{app:impulse_long}
|
||||||
|
[to be done :)]
|
||||||
|
\begin{equation}
|
||||||
|
\end{equation}
|
||||||
|
@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ polygons; the resolution of the collision, i.e. finding the final
|
|||||||
velocity vectors and angular speed of those polygons.
|
velocity vectors and angular speed of those polygons.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsection{Moment of inertia}
|
\subsection{Moment of inertia}
|
||||||
|
\label{sub:moment}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The inertia of an object refers to the tendency of an object to resist a change
|
The inertia of an object refers to the tendency of an object to resist a change
|
||||||
of its state of motion or rest, it describes how the object behaves when forces
|
of its state of motion or rest, it describes how the object behaves when forces
|
||||||
@ -264,6 +265,7 @@ to the overall polygon.
|
|||||||
where, $P_{n+1} = P_1$ in the case of $i = n$.
|
where, $P_{n+1} = P_1$ in the case of $i = n$.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsection{Collision detection}
|
\subsection{Collision detection}
|
||||||
|
\label{sub:collision-detection}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Collision detection, as the name suggests, are the algorithms used to detect
|
Collision detection, as the name suggests, are the algorithms used to detect
|
||||||
whether two polygons are colliding. The result of this procedure must be an
|
whether two polygons are colliding. The result of this procedure must be an
|
||||||
@ -462,3 +464,161 @@ find the normal. The results look realistic enough to be accepted.
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsection{Collision resolution}
|
\subsection{Collision resolution}
|
||||||
\label{sub:resolution}
|
\label{sub:resolution}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The collision resolution is the last step in the processing of the collision.
|
||||||
|
Algorithmically, it is much less heavy than collision detection, since, once the
|
||||||
|
simulation has two colliding polygons, a point of impact and a normal vector,
|
||||||
|
it's just a case of applying the rigid body physics formulas to the polygons
|
||||||
|
that are colliding. This part has been helped a lot by the works of Erik Neumann
|
||||||
|
\cite{collision:resolution-site} and Chris Hecker
|
||||||
|
\cite{collision:resolution-paper}.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\begin{figure}[H]
|
||||||
|
\centering
|
||||||
|
\inputtikz[.5]{collision_resolution}
|
||||||
|
\caption{Collision resolution between polygons $A$ and $B$}
|
||||||
|
\label{fig:collision_resolution}
|
||||||
|
\end{figure}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\paragraph{Variable definition} Before getting into any maths, let's define some
|
||||||
|
variables that we are going to use
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\begin{multicols}{2}
|
||||||
|
\begin{itemize}
|
||||||
|
\item $m_a, m_b = $ mass of the bodies $A$ and $B$
|
||||||
|
\item $\vec r_{ap} = $ distance vector from center of mass of body $A$ to
|
||||||
|
point $P$
|
||||||
|
\item $\vec r_{bp} = $ distance vector from center of mass of body $A$ to
|
||||||
|
point $P$
|
||||||
|
\item $\omega_{a1}, \omega_{b1} = $ initial angular velocity of bodies
|
||||||
|
$A, B$
|
||||||
|
\item $\omega_{a2}, \omega_{b2} = $ final angular velocity of bodies
|
||||||
|
$A, B$
|
||||||
|
\item $\vec v_{a1}, \vec v_{b1} =$ initial velocities of center of mass
|
||||||
|
bodies $A, B$
|
||||||
|
\item $\vec v_{a2}, \vec v_{b2} =$ final velocities of center of mass
|
||||||
|
bodies $A, B$
|
||||||
|
\item $\vec v_{ap1}=$ initial velocity of impact point $P$ on body $A$
|
||||||
|
\item $\vec v_{bp1}=$ initial velocity of impact point $P$ on body $B$
|
||||||
|
\item $\vec v_{p1}=$ initial relative velocity of impact points on body $A, B$
|
||||||
|
\item $\vec v_{p2}=$ final relative velocity of impact points on body $A, B$
|
||||||
|
\item $\vec n=$ normal vector
|
||||||
|
\item $ e=$ elastic coefficient (0 = inelastic, 1 = perfectly elastic)
|
||||||
|
\end{itemize}
|
||||||
|
\end{multicols}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Some of those variables, like the ones in the left column, are already given by
|
||||||
|
the simulation, some of them have been computed thanks to the algorithms in
|
||||||
|
section \ref{sub:collision-detection} (normal vector and position of point $P$),
|
||||||
|
and some have still to be defined mathematically, such as $\vec v_{ap1},\vec
|
||||||
|
v_{bp1},\vec v_{p1}$ and $\vec v_{p2}$. So the velocity vectors of impact
|
||||||
|
point $P$ on both bodies, before the collision, are
|
||||||
|
\begin{equation} \label{eq:vabp1}
|
||||||
|
\begin{split}
|
||||||
|
\vec v_{ap1} = \vec v_{a1} + \omega_{a1} \times \vec r_{ap} \\
|
||||||
|
\vec v_{bp1} = \vec v_{b1} + \omega_{b1} \times \vec r_{bp}
|
||||||
|
\end{split}
|
||||||
|
\end{equation}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Similarly, the final velocities are
|
||||||
|
\begin{equation} \label{eq:vabp2}
|
||||||
|
\begin{split}
|
||||||
|
\vec v_{ap2} = \vec v_{a2} + \omega_{a2} \times \vec r_{ap}\\
|
||||||
|
\vec v_{bp2} = \vec v_{b2} + \omega_{b2} \times \vec r_{bp}
|
||||||
|
\end{split}
|
||||||
|
\end{equation}
|
||||||
|
Here we are regarding the angular velocity as a 3-dimensional vector
|
||||||
|
perpendicular to the plane, so that the cross product is calculated as
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
$$ \omega \times \vec r = \begin{pmatrix} 0\\0\\\omega \end{pmatrix} \times
|
||||||
|
\begin{pmatrix} r_x\\r_y\\0 \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} -\omega r_y \\
|
||||||
|
\omega r_x \\0\end{pmatrix} $$
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
We these variables, we can finally define the relative velocities $\vec
|
||||||
|
v_{p1}$ and $\vec v_{p2}$
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\[ \begin{split}
|
||||||
|
\vec v_{p1} = \vec v_{ap1} - \vec v_{bp2}\\
|
||||||
|
\vec v_{p2} = \vec v_{ap2} - \vec v_{bp2}
|
||||||
|
\end{split} \]
|
||||||
|
If we expand by using \ref{eq:vabp1} and \ref{eq:vabp2}, we get
|
||||||
|
\begin{equation}
|
||||||
|
\begin{split}
|
||||||
|
\vec v_{p1} = \vec v_{a1} + \omega_{a1} \times \vec r_{ap} - \vec v_{b1}
|
||||||
|
+ \omega_{b1} \times \vec r_{bp}\\
|
||||||
|
\vec v_{p2} = \vec v_{a2} + \omega_{a2} \times \vec r_{ap} - \vec v_{b2} + \omega_{b2} \times \vec r_{bp}
|
||||||
|
\end{split}
|
||||||
|
\end{equation}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The relative velocity of point $P$ along the normal vector $\vec n$ is
|
||||||
|
$$ \vec v_{p1} \cdot \vec n $$
|
||||||
|
Note that for a collision to occur this relative normal velocity must be
|
||||||
|
negative (that is, the objects must be approaching each other). Let e be the
|
||||||
|
elasticity of the collision, having a value between 0 (inelastic) and 1
|
||||||
|
(perfectly elastic). We now make an important assumption in the form of the
|
||||||
|
following relation
|
||||||
|
\begin{equation}
|
||||||
|
\label{eq:vp2n}
|
||||||
|
\vec v_{p2} \cdot \vec n = - e \vec v_{p1} \cdot \vec n
|
||||||
|
\end{equation}
|
||||||
|
This says that the velocity at which the objects fly apart is proportional to
|
||||||
|
the velocity with which they were coming together. The proportionality factor is
|
||||||
|
the elasticity $e$.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\paragraph{Collision Impulse} In simple terms, collision impulse refers to the
|
||||||
|
change in momentum experienced by an object during a collision. It is a measure
|
||||||
|
of the force applied to an object over a short period of time. We imagine that
|
||||||
|
during the collision there is a very large force acting for a very brief period
|
||||||
|
of time. If you integrate (sum) that force over that brief time, you get the
|
||||||
|
impulse.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
In our simulation, we are assuming that no friction is happening during the
|
||||||
|
collision, so that the only force we have to consider is the one of along the
|
||||||
|
normal vector $\vec n$. The friction would create a force perpendicular to the
|
||||||
|
normal, and it would make things a little too complicated for the scope of this
|
||||||
|
project.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Since the only force we consider is the normal one, we can consider the net
|
||||||
|
impulse to be $j \vec n$, where $j$ is the impulse parameter. The body $A$ will
|
||||||
|
experience the net impulse $j \vec n$ and body $B$ will experience it's negation
|
||||||
|
$- j \vec n$ since the force that $B$ experience is equal an opposite to the one
|
||||||
|
experienced by $A$. The impulse is a change in momentum. Momentum has units of
|
||||||
|
velocity times mass, so if we divide the impulse by the mass we get the change
|
||||||
|
in velocity. We can relate initial and final velocities as
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\begin{equation}
|
||||||
|
\label{eq:va2}
|
||||||
|
\vec v_{a2} = \vec v_{a1} + \frac{j\vec n}{m_a}
|
||||||
|
\end{equation}
|
||||||
|
\begin{equation}
|
||||||
|
\label{eq:vb2}
|
||||||
|
\vec v_{b2} = \vec v_{b1} - \frac{j\vec n}{m_b}
|
||||||
|
\end{equation}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
For the final angular speed, it's change from the impulse $j\vec n$ is given by
|
||||||
|
$\vec r_{ap} \times j \vec n$. We can divide the result by the moment of
|
||||||
|
inertia, which was calculated in section \ref{sub:moment}, to get convert the
|
||||||
|
change in angular momentum into change in angular speed. Similarly as above, we
|
||||||
|
can relate the initial and final angular velocity as
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\begin{equation}
|
||||||
|
\label{eq:omega_a2}
|
||||||
|
\omega_{a2} = \omega_{a1} + \frac{\vec r_{ap} \times j\vec n}{I_a}
|
||||||
|
\end{equation}
|
||||||
|
\begin{equation}
|
||||||
|
\label{eq:omega_b2}
|
||||||
|
\omega_{b2} = \omega_{b1} - \frac{\vec r_{bp} \times j\vec n}{I_b}
|
||||||
|
\end{equation}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\paragraph{Solving for the impulse parameter}
|
||||||
|
Now we have everything we need to solve for the impulse parameter $j$. The bulk
|
||||||
|
of the calculations can be found in section \ref{app:impulse_long} of the
|
||||||
|
appendix \ref{appendix:calculations}. But basically we start with equation
|
||||||
|
\ref{eq:vp2n} and we end up with
|
||||||
|
\begin{equation}
|
||||||
|
\label{eq:j}
|
||||||
|
j = \frac{ - (1+e) \cdot \vec v_{ap1} \cdot \vec n }{\frac{1}{m_a} + \frac{1}{m_b} +
|
||||||
|
\frac{\left( \vec r_{ap} \times \vec n \right)^2}{I_a} + \frac{\left( \vec
|
||||||
|
r_{bp} \times \vec n \right)^2}{I_b}}
|
||||||
|
\end{equation}
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user